“Do not reuse conditions was the verdict of the Parish Working Group on the proposal of the voters of Santo Amador, to leave the Union of Parishes of Moura.
They were the voters of Santo Amador, municipality of Moura, who signed the proposal for the desegregation of the Union of Parishes of Moura, which integrates the former urban parishes of Santo Agostinho and São João Batista.
The Technical Evaluation Committee of the Assembly Parishes Working Group, maintains in the report on the parish desegregation process that it “does not meet the conditions”, justifying that “the deliberation took place after 12/21/2022”.
Of 190 processes filed with the Assembly of the Republic, only two were proposed by voters. Beyond Santo Amador, also Requeixo, in the municipality of Aveiro and which was also refused
Of the proposals for the desegregation of parishes presented in the district of Beja, eight were approved (8) proposals, reject three (3) is (1) qualified as not being a process.
The Technical Assessment Committee of the Working Group on Parishes of the Assembly of the Republic has already delivered the report on the parish desegregation process, and from the district of Beja, eleven (12), but, an (1) of them was not qualified as a process (Santa Vitória and Mombeja-Municipality of Beja).
According to the document to which Lidador Notícias had access, the proposals of the Municipal Assemblies of Aljustrel were accepted, Almodovar, Ferreira do Alentejo, Moura, Ourique and Serpa and rejected those of Castro Verde and Odemira. With the approval of the eight proposals, 8 new parishes.
The report will be revealed tomorrow and the final approval schedule is as follows: Submission of legislative initiatives until 08 January 2025 and Plenary Session between 15 and 18 January 2025.
Approved
Aljustrel – Proposal to disaggregate the Union of Parishes of Aljustrel and Rio de Moinhos- 2 new parishes, Almodovar – Proposal to disaggregate the Union of Parishes of Almodôvar and Graça dos Padrão- 2, Almodovar – Proposal to disaggregate the Union of Parishes of Santa-Clara-a-Nova and Gomes Aires- 2, Ferreira do Alentejo – Proposal to desegregate the Union of Parishes of Alfundão and Peroguarda- 2, Ferreira do Alentejo – Proposal for desegregation Union of Parishes of Ferreira do Alentejo and Canhestros- 2, Moura – Proposal for desegregation Union of Parishes of Safara and Santo Aleixo da Restauração- 2, Ourique – Proposal for desegregation Union of Parishes of Garvão and Santa Luzia- 2 and Serpa – Proposal to disaggregate the Union of Parishes of Vila Nova de S. Benedict and Vale de Vargo- 2.
Rejected- Does not meet the conditions
Castro Verde – Proposal to disaggregate the Union of Parishes of Castro Verde and Casével
Moura – Proposal to disaggregate the Union of Parishes of Moura (Saint Augustine and Saint John the Baptist) and Santo Amador
Odemira – Proposal for the desegregation of the Bicos Parish Union, Colos and Vale of Santiago
Does not qualify as a process
Beja- Proposal for desegregation Union of Parishes of Santa Vitória and Mombeja
In 2013, with the reform imposed by the then PSD/CDS-PP government, with the “Relvas Law”, the Beja district lost 25 percent of its parishes, passing 100 to 75. With the approval of the eight proposals, 8 new parishes, in the next municipal elections, the district of Beja will now have 83 parishes.
Presidents of unions with three terms cannot run for separate parishes.
Of the ten parish unions in the Beja district that may disintegrate, there are four whose presidents are serving their third term and cannot re-apply for the presidency of the parishes that will separate.
Contrary to what happened in 2013, presidents of parish unions who are now serving their third consecutive term, will not be able to run for president of parishes that separate from the one they have led since then.
The precept is written into the law of 2021, which defines the breeding regime, modification and extinction of parishes and clarifies the rules on limiting the successive renewal of mandates. The National Elections Commission (CNE) Haven't even debated the issue yet.
Teixeira Correia
(journalist)