Odemira: Paternity Zmar Eco Resort in court.
architecture paternity of the Eco Resort project takes four defendants in the dock. The case went all the judicial circuit since the charge of the MP to the Constitutional Court. Architect demands to be repaid in about 400.000 euros.
Seven years after the complaint and five on bringing charges by the public prosecutor of Odemira, finally comes to trial Beja, before a Collective Court, the process in which the Multiparques, Company owning ZMAR, Eco Camping Resort located in Odemira, its two representatives and an architect, They are accused as co-authors of a counterfeiting crime and theft crime.
To come to trial, the process went all the judicial circuit after the MP's accusation in January 2012, starting three years later when the Odemira Court upheld the accusation, after completion of the process of opening education.
An appeal to the Évora Relationship, where the accused wielded in instructory decision "was refused", and finally, last June, the Constitutional Court decided "not take note of it", having also punished each applicant to pay the legal costs, set in seven units of account (714 euros each).
The facts date back to 2006, when you have not been respected, by the defendants, a verbal agreement schedules, made with the architect José Costa Pina and your company, for the preparation of the architectural design ZMAR.
After the merger of companies, there was agreement on "paternity" of the project and the procedure, consulted by Lidador News (LN), the Multiparques and architect Aida Correia, Odemira presented in the Chamber prior consultation and licensing of protests, "As of his own", and to this end it has been covered company data José Costa Pina-Architecture,Lda.
The victim demands to be compensated from the budget of 386.468 euros, resulting from the remainder of the fees owed for the work performed, expenses and personal injury.
Teixeira Correia
(journalist)
