Opinion (José Lúcio / Judge): Justice and frog.
Unusual happens often see and hear political leaders and renowned experts in this field to speak about justice and get the uneasy feeling that the most obvious escape the scholarly ramblings - the most basic do not notice.
José Lúcio
(Judge President of Beja County)
They insist and make insist that things are not going as they would like, but they forget the basic fact that only able to walk that has legs to walk - for legs should be understood here the instruments, the means, the structure needed to match all requests and pulse.
are lost or so apparent in the accessory, ignoring the essential. Maybe not on purpose (sometimes be, it is apparent that for many the Justice worry much when it works than when it does not).
However, is inevitable frustration of those who attend know inside what you speaking out. Are exercises where reality does not enter, however learned that the clothing is. And do not spare the diagnosis observatories, laboratories, commissions, offices, and expert reviewers, all converging on the belief that the frog does not jump because they do not hear, as concluded in an anecdote told me that there are already a few years.
Some of my friends already know, but I can not resist telling. It is the story of the scientist and frog, delicious irony, about the fragility of many findings that often serve us shrouded in rigorous scientific claims.
A scientist occupied the best of your time and your effort to the study of frogs. And at some point it has engaged in an experiment. A frog trained to obey a simple command: he ordered him to jump, and the frog jumped. The animal was already very well trained - enough to jump order, nor was it necessary to repeat. she jumped, obedientemente. At this point, this phase is completed, the scientist decided to start new stage of his experience.
He started by booting one leg frog. Then he issued the usual commanding voice: jumps! A rã, even clumsily and a movement something rough, obeyed as usual. The scientist noted his observation, and continued. A second leg tore the frog. After, made to order: jumps! Poor frog, with difficulty, He struggled in the two legs that were left him there and jumped, a clumsy tumble. The scientist returned to write down your notebook, and continued experimentation. He tore the third leg frog. Here the poor animal was panting, with all the symptoms of not being any better - but the experimenter continued: jumps! The animal showed great difficulty moving,, volvia him some anxious eyes, and he insisted: jumps! At the insistence, poor frog, relying on a single leg, He got a small boost and responded with a jump mimicry. The scientist has at his notes, increasingly absorbed in the experience, and decided to continue. finally pulled the last leg frog. To follow, addressing the remaining frog, He insisted on command so often rehearsed: jumps! And has insisted to insist. Salta! Poor frog showed an agonized look, and remained in total immobility.
The scientist, persistent, not neglected certification imposed by the rules of science: He repeated the order as often seemed to him necessary in order to remove, with the desired accuracy, the lessons of experience. However, nothing has changed - the frog did not move, however much he teimasse.
then, ufano of their work, the scientist has reopened the notebook, He described the final part of the experience, and ended with his ilacção: the frog with no legs do not hear.
I dare not write here that the usual pundits personal opinions in the field of Justice have the urge to cut her legs and then regret their lack of hearing; but they do their best to ignore that legless nothing goes as it should be, there is this true.
(Text written under the previous rule to spell AO1990, by the author's option)
