Opinion (José Lúcio / Judge): writing Balance.
After some time spent in the same exercise naturally arises the question - and worth?
José Lúcio
(Judge President of Beja County)
And so, every time you persist in this stubborn communicate with readers who do not even know if I have, assails me the consequent question - is it worth it?
I confess that not yet found an answer to convince me. Sometimes I feel so, someone there-reading and find some usefulness and accuracy in my writings, assuming they are not inept at all. Sometimes I fear not, scarce readers for deference and sympathy possibly read me certainly will not find here more than a little evidence and many other banalities.
Writing is a solitary exercise course, and you never know who is on the other side, if there is someone on the other side, and what will think or feel about what we thought, We feel and tried to say.
Wrote imagining a dialogue, and never ceases to be a monologue.
The successive attempts object has always been the same, things of Justice, the plurality of sense that the term is used, but with a focus on the courts, and sometimes even more specifically the Court of Beja County. The aim has also been constant, seek to bring to a wider audience and usually away these themes the reality of the courts and the judiciary generally things.
In a word, help to install the relevant rightful place in the published opinion (and then in public opinion) all that relates to the administration of justice.
You could say that is a lot of ambition for such a small company and entrepreneur so limited. Accepts the diagnosis, but matter retort that is a matter of scale. Each in its field of action can certainly contribute to overall objectives which obviously transcend. Do not you may require more, but do your part is not bad enough. I always have this person's insistent repair, undisputed personality of our media, that following a discussion of these concerns repeated me "we need to listen to you, we need to listen to you ".
He wanted to say, with good faith and sincerity, in the womb of the media often causes great perplexity the paradox jump to the forefront of news current affairs of judicial life with greater relevance to the collective life and not have to comment or clarify anyone who is not outside the judicial universe (usually without preparation and / or personal perspectives that do not translate to inform or clarify).
In other words, we lack almost always a word from within - told me that my name, with the authority of its own experience and responsibilities in the great media. We know it's there: Justice is the great changes, even in the debates that it directly and immediately concern.
Thus, they are not surprising distortions, manipulations, lack of accuracy and clarification often faced with. The theme of justice is free field for ignorance, demagoguery and bad faith, together or separately.
These reflections will be sufficient justification for continuing effort to, evidently, can with high probability to show up inglorious? Ṇo posso ignorar os riscos pessoais envolvidos Рthis leaving the comfort zone, offer mo us exposure, It has much to tell you in an environment where sometimes do dead is still a good rule of survival.
although. All heavy and weighed, some compensation there must be. And if there is no, patience - remains the awareness of having tried to serve.
I confess that animates me that hope to leave valuable contribution to what may be positive in the new visibility of justice. Repeating written history, comfort me the perspective to contribute to the theme of the courts and justice becomes more familiar to our fellow citizens and so everyone can know us better.
If a result can appreciate us more, sure that no one can say it was not worth it.
(Text written under the previous rule to spell AO1990, by the author's option)
